Atomic Heart Review: A Beautiful Nightmare of Broken Ideals

 

Atomic Heart is the kind of game that immediately tells you it has something to say, even if it does not always know how to say it cleanly. From the moment you step into its twisted vision of a Soviet inspired utopia, you can feel the weight of ambition pressing against every surface. This is not a small game thinking small thoughts. Atomic Heart wants to be loud, strange, uncomfortable, political, philosophical, and stylish all at once. Sometimes it succeeds brilliantly. Other times it trips over its own confidence. What makes it fascinating is that even when it stumbles, it never feels boring.

Developed by Mundfish, Atomic Heart is a first person action game set in an alternate history where the Soviet Union achieved technological supremacy through robotics, neural science, and an experimental polymer substance that quite literally reshaped humanity. On paper, it sounds like a familiar setup. In practice, Atomic Heart is anything but familiar. It is a game drenched in contradictions. It is violent but elegant, deeply serious yet often juvenile, horrifying but frequently absurd. It is a world where ideology has rotted from the inside, and the player is forced to wade through the consequences with very little moral clarity.

By the time the credits roll, Atomic Heart leaves you with more questions than answers. Not just about the story, but about its themes, its characters, and what it ultimately believes about control, progress, and free will.

A World Built on False Perfection

Atomic Heart opens with a striking sense of confidence. The early moments present a Soviet utopia at its absolute peak. Floating robots cheerfully assist civilians. Cities are clean and bright. Technology blends seamlessly into everyday life. It is almost intoxicating. Mundfish clearly understood that the best way to sell a dystopia is to first convince you that it works.

The game wastes no time ripping away the surface level perfection and revealing the rot beneath. Robots malfunction. Bodies pile up. Systems collapse in grotesque and violent ways. The shift from celebration to catastrophe is jarring, but deliberately so. Atomic Heart wants you to feel betrayed by the world it built for you, because that betrayal is central to its identity.

The environments are one of the game’s greatest strengths. From sprawling research facilities to underground laboratories filled with nightmarish experiments, Atomic Heart consistently delivers locations that feel lived in, purposeful, and unsettling. There is an almost obsessive level of environmental detail, with propaganda posters, discarded notes, and half finished projects telling quiet stories about a society that believed it had solved every problem. The result is a world that feels authentic in its collapse.

This is not just a backdrop for combat. It is a character in its own right. A world that believed it could engineer perfection, only to discover that human ambition is the most unstable variable of all.

Combat That Rewards Creativity, Not Comfort

At its core, Atomic Heart is a first person action game with a heavy emphasis on aggressive, close quarters combat. Guns exist, but they are not always reliable, plentiful, or efficient. Melee combat plays a central role, especially in the early hours, forcing you to get uncomfortably close to enemies that are often faster, stronger, and more unpredictable than you would like.

The combat system thrives on improvisation. You are encouraged to use a combination of melee weapons, firearms, and polymer based abilities that allow you to manipulate enemies and the environment. Freezing foes mid attack, hurling them into walls, or tearing apart robotic enemies piece by piece feels immensely satisfying when everything clicks.

However, Atomic Heart does not always explain itself well. Some mechanics feel underdeveloped or poorly communicated, leading to moments of frustration rather than mastery. Enemy variety is strong in concept but inconsistent in execution. Some encounters feel thrilling and tense, while others devolve into repetitive patterns that drag on longer than they should.

Boss fights are a mixed bag. Visually, they are incredible. Mechanically, they can be uneven. When a boss leans into the game’s strengths, forcing you to adapt and think creatively, it shines. When it relies too heavily on inflated health pools or awkward arenas, the experience falters.

Despite these issues, Atomic Heart deserves credit for refusing to play it safe. It wants you to engage with its systems, not coast through encounters on autopilot. When it works, the combat feels chaotic in the best possible way.

A Protagonist You Will Either Tolerate or Loathe

The player character, Major Sergey Nechaev, better known as P 3, is one of the most divisive elements of Atomic Heart. He is loud, abrasive, sarcastic, and frequently crude. His constant commentary can feel grating, especially during longer play sessions. There are moments where his dialogue undercuts the tension of a scene instead of enhancing it.

As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that his personality is not accidental. His attitude is shaped by trauma, manipulation, and a fractured sense of identity. Without diving too deeply into spoilers just yet, P 3 is not simply an action hero cracking jokes in the face of horror. He is a deeply broken individual whose memories and emotions have been altered, suppressed, and rewritten.

This does not excuse all of the writing choices made around him, but it does contextualize them. By the end of the game, P 3 feels less like a traditional protagonist and more like a cautionary example of what happens when autonomy is stripped away in the name of efficiency.

Storytelling That Embraces Ambiguity

Atomic Heart’s narrative is bold, messy, and unapologetically strange. It does not hold your hand, and it does not always provide clear answers. The story revolves around the consequences of unchecked technological advancement, the dangers of centralized control, and the ease with which ideology can justify atrocity.

The game explores themes of free will through its polymer technology, which allows humans to connect their minds to a collective network. In theory, this system is meant to eliminate conflict, misunderstanding, and inequality. In practice, it becomes a tool for surveillance, manipulation, and absolute control.

As the truth behind the polymer project is revealed, Atomic Heart leans heavily into psychological horror. The line between human and machine blurs in disturbing ways. Characters who once seemed benevolent are exposed as monsters. Others who appeared monstrous reveal unexpected humanity. The story does not offer a clean moral resolution. There are no easy heroes or villains. Every major decision is tainted by compromise and consequence. Even the ending, or endings depending on player choice, refuse to provide comfort.This ambiguity is one of Atomic Heart’s greatest strengths. It trusts the player to sit with discomfort rather than resolve it.

Spoilers: The Cost of Control

In the latter half of Atomic Heart, the game reveals its most disturbing truth. P 3’s memories have been manipulated. His loyalty has been engineered. His identity is not fully his own. The very tools he uses to fight against the system are the same tools used to control him.

The revelation reframes the entire experience. The player realizes that they have been complicit in enforcing the will of a system that strips humanity of choice. Even acts of rebellion may have been orchestrated. The final choices presented to the player are deliberately unsatisfying. There is no option that leads to a clean victory. Every ending carries loss. This reinforces the central thesis of Atomic Heart. Absolute control, even when motivated by idealism, inevitably leads to dehumanisation.

Final Thoughts

Atomic Heart is not a perfect game. It is rough around the edges, occasionally self indulgent, and sometimes frustrating. Its writing can be uneven. Its pacing can drag. Its protagonist will not resonate with everyone.

And yet, it is undeniably memorable.

Few games commit so fully to their vision, even when that vision risks alienating players. Atomic Heart dares to be strange, provocative, and uncomfortable. It asks difficult questions and refuses to provide easy answers. It challenges the player not just mechanically, but philosophically.

In an industry that often prioritizes safety and familiarity, Atomic Heart stands out as something bold and uncompromising. It may not be universally loved, but it is impossible to ignore. For better and for worse, Atomic Heart leaves a mark. And sometimes, that is exactly what great art is meant to do.

Rob Lake - For more comic book and video game chat why not follow us on TikTok, Facebook, and Bluesky